09/03/2024 - Jefferson City, MO
A new report released
today by Missouri State Auditor Scott Fitzpatrick details how most of the
state's largest public pension systems have failed to put policies in place to
ensure corporate voting decisions prioritize shareholder return. The report
examined the proxy voting policies of the state's eight largest public
retirement systems, which manage more than $85.2 billion, and found most of the
systems need to provide more guidance on how they want proxy votes cast, and
that all of the systems need to improve their review of proxy votes to make
sure they comply with their policies. The lack of guidelines and review
resulted in proxy votes for these systems being cast in an inconsistent manner.
A review of seven Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)-related proxy
votes during the audit period noted five instances in which proxy votes for a
system were made both for and against the same proposal, effectively canceling
out the vote of pension members.
"For the hundreds
of thousands of public employees here in Missouri who are counting on their
pensions to be there in retirement, it is incredibly important that our
retirement systems manage these funds in a way that will prioritize maximizing
their returns, not advancing ESG initiatives," said Auditor Fitzpatrick.
"Unfortunately we see proxy voting policies for many of these systems that
lack specific guidance and oversight to ensure fiduciary duty is the top
priority for their investment managers. When systems allow their asset managers
to vote on both sides of an issue or prioritize advancing social and political
causes above maximizing shareholder returns, they are squandering their
members' votes, and that is unacceptable. Going forward these systems need to
improve their policies and do a better job of monitoring the proxy votes that
are made to make absolutely certain they prioritize shareholder return."
Because the eight
systems reviewed by the State Auditor's Office have more than $15.2 billion
invested in managed accounts, they own voting shares of various companies via
external investment managers. These shares are voted on by the investment
managers via proxy votes pursuant to agreements between the retirement system
and the investment manager or other proxy voting service.
The audit found only
two of the eight systems reviewed (Missouri State Employees' Retirement System
and Public School and Education Employee Retirement Systems of Missouri) have
proxy voting policies that addressed how certain issues should be voted. The
other systems reviewed have policies with general language stating proxy votes
should be in the best interest of the system and its participants, but no
specific guidelines on how votes should be cast. Only one of the eight systems
(MOSERS) requires a proxy voting advisor and specifies the factors the proxy
voting advisor must consider.
The report also details
how all of the systems need to improve how they monitor proxy votes. None of
the systems reviewed have policies in place to require a review of the proxy
votes cast on behalf of the system. Additionally, five of the eight systems do
not perform a regular review of proxy voting reports to ensure compliance with
their policies. The report notes that even though the systems had general
policies in place to require the vote to be in the best financial interest of
the system, the lack of specific guidance resulted in different managers
reaching opposing conclusions about which vote complied with policy.
The report recommends
that all public retirement systems consider improving proxy policies by
including more specific guidance on how the system wants proxy votes cast,
similar to the policies used by MOSERS and PSRS/PEERS. The report also
recommends all systems put policies in place to obtain and review proxy voting
reports to make certain they are in compliance with applicable proxy voting
policies.
The audit reviewed the
proxy voting policies of MOSERS, PSRS/PEERS, County Employees' Retirement Fund
(CERF), Kansas City Public School Retirement System (KC PSRS), Local Government
Employees Retirement System (LAGERS), Missouri Department of Transportation and
Missouri Highway Patrol Employees' Retirement System (MPERS), Public School
Retirement System of the City of St. Louis (PSRSSTL), and University of
Missouri System Retirement (UM RET). Because Auditor Fitzpatrick served on the
MOSERS Board of Trustees as State Treasurer during the audit period, he recused
himself from all portions of the audit dealing with MOSERS.
The full report is
available here.