10/09/2025 - JEFFERSON CITY, Mo.
A new audit report released today by State Auditor Scott
Fitzpatrick details how the City of Joplin misused a process to approve city
ordinances that limited opportunities for input from the public. The report,
which gives the city a rating of "fair," also highlights the need for
the city to improve its budgeting process and its accounting controls and
procedures.
"It is absolutely essential that citizens have an adequate
opportunity to have their voices heard on policy changes that will impact their
day-to-day lives, and the City of Joplin's frequent use of the emergency
ordinance process likely prevented some citizens from providing input to the
City Council when time was not of the essence" said Auditor Fitzpatrick.
"It's understandable that some ordinance changes fall into the emergency category
but it simply is not the case that 80% of the ordinances considered by the city
during the period of time we examined needed to be classified this way. It's
good to see the city has significantly reduced its use of this process and, for
the sake of the citizens of Joplin, I hope city officials will emphasize the
use of the normal process that ensures citizens have ample opportunity to be
heard."
The report found that during the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2023, 130 of the 162 ordinances (80%) discussed in City Council
meetings were emergency ordinances. When
an ordinance is classified as an emergency, the amount of time it takes to pass
the bill is reduced and the Home Rule Charter does not require allowance for
public comment, potentially limiting the transparency of the action. The audit
points out that passing ordinances
under the regular process with greater opportunity for public input would help
ensure citizens the City Council is taking their concerns into consideration,
provide additional assurance the City Council is fulfilling its fiduciary
responsibilities, and could increase public support for Council decisions.
The audit also
found the Joplin City Council
did not prepare complete budgets as required by state law or properly amend the
budget prior to fiscal year end. The City Council did not include the
amount of encumbrances not yet paid at the end of the prior year in the adopted
city budget for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2023. In total, approximately
$12,769,000 in planned expenditures from encumbrances were not included in the
approved fiscal year 2023 budget and only added in late November 2022. The City
Council did not disclose the additional expenditures to the public.
Additionally, the Finance Director did not timely prepare, and the City Council
did not timely approve, the final budget amendments for the fiscal year. The
Finance Director indicated budget amendments are typically done after the
city's fiscal year end to adjust budgeted amounts to agree to actual
disbursements after year end entries. The report notes proper monitoring and amending prior to
disbursing funds is necessary for the budget to be an effective management tool
and to comply with state law.
Another finding
in the report details how the city needs to improve its accounting controls and
procedures. User activity for users with complete access to the
financial and budgeting accounting system is not adequately reviewed, which
increases the risk of erroneous changes or improper activity. The city has also
failed to implement
adequate receipting and reconciling procedures, which increases the risk that
errors, loss, theft, or misuse of money will occur and go undetected.
Additionally, Finance Department personnel do not have adequate procedures to
collect outstanding accounts receivable balances. As of October 31, 2023, there were 1,485
customers with outstanding balances due totaling approximately $2.7 million, of
which 710 accounts, totaling $745,628, were over a year old. The Finance
Director indicated department personnel were not following up on outstanding
account balances due to understaffing. Finance
Department personnel also fail to reconcile utility records monthly, including
total billings, payments received, and amounts remaining unpaid for utility
services, which increases the risk that errors or discrepancies aren't detected
timely.
The report also examined the
city's payroll and allowance procedures and found they need improvement. The city
does not have a process to ensure the leave balances of department directors
and employees appointed by the City Council are accurate. Without adequate
records of leave taken, the city cannot ensure hours worked and leave earned
and taken by employees are properly documented. The city has no documentation
supporting vehicle allowance amounts are reasonable or necessary. The city pays
vehicle allowances ranging from $1,800 to $6,000 annually to 17 employees for
using their personal vehicles to conduct city business. In total, the city paid
approximately $74,000 in vehicle allowances for the fiscal year ended October
31, 2023. Using the federal reimbursement rate of $0.655 per mile, the
employees would have to travel approximately 379 to 826 miles per month or 12
to 27 miles per day to equal the allowance.
Other findings in the report include the city's lack of an internal audit function, the failure of Building Department personnel to report all dangerous buildings to the Building Board of Appeals as required by city code, lacking oversight of the Joplin Sports Authority by the City Council, the failure of the City Council to review and approve closed meeting minutes, a failure by the Convention and Visitors Bureau to bid some purchases as required, and the lack of a records management and retention policy that includes electronic communication in compliance with the Missouri Secretary of State Records Services Division guidance, as approved by the Missouri Local Records Commission.
Read the complete audit report here.