![]() |
YELLOW SHEET Office of the State Auditor of Missouri |
July 30, 2003
Report No. 2003-75
Inadequate insurance coverage and improper
closed meetings noted in audit of
This audit reviewed practices and procedures of the
St. Louis Regional Convention and Sports Complex Authority (the Authority) for
the three years ending
50-day lapse in adequate earthquake insurance
coverage for sports dome
For 50 days in the summer of 2002, the Dome was not adequately insured against earthquake damage.
The Authority owns the Dome and is responsible for
its maintenance and preservation.��
However, the Authority has leased the Dome to the St. Louis Convention
and Visitors Commission (the CVC), which is also responsible for the rest of
the
During the period from
Although Authority officials had discussions with CVC officials regarding insurance difficulties well before the July 2002 renewal date, additional efforts were apparently needed to resolve the difficulties before the lapse in coverage.
In a response to the
finding, the Authority asserted it had properly exercised due diligence
to ensure the CVC fulfilled it responsibilities regarding the lease. �When the Authority became aware the earthquake
insurance was less than necessary, it made demands on the CVC to obtain
additional insurance. ��However, the
Authority stated it has taken steps to improve interaction and communications
with the CVC. ��(See page 5)
Some of the Authority's closed meetings did not
fully comply with the Sunshine Law
Auditors found several examples of items improperly discussed
in closed session meetings, such as the use of the Authority's suite at the
Dome by current and former commissioners and �inquiries from the St. Louis Mayor's office
regarding the purpose of the Authority and its budget.� Authority officials agreed that sometimes
matters such as these came up in closed session, but then quickly terminated
and handled later in open session.� Meeting
minutes did not show the length of such discussions. �In addition, the meeting minutes do not specify
the particular reasons for going into closed session, which is required by
state law.�
In a response to the finding, the Authority
disagreed with the auditors' conclusions and asserted that the Authority's
meetings are in full compliance with the Sunshine Law; however, it indicated it
�has since distributed information to
commissioners detailing appropriate closed meeting subjects and will endeavor
to be as specific as possible when citing statutory authority to go into closed
session. �(See page 8)